Democrats Wave Social Security Bloody Shirt

Can Social Security save Democrats this fall?

Democrats, faced with a worsening national political climate and daunting historical midterm election trends, are turning to Social Security as an issue where they believe they can score political points and set the stakes of what a Republican-controlled Congress would look like.

At least a half-dozen Democratic House candidates as well as several Democratic Senators in tight re-election races have featured claims that the GOP wants to either privatize or eliminate the retirement plan entirely in new television ads, and party strategists promise there are far more commercials to come.

"When Leader John Boehner, Paul Ryan and House Republican leaders put privatizing Social Security and dismantling Medicare into their budget they drew a bright line: House Republicans fight for Wall Street, while Democrats fight for seniors who've worked hard and played by the rules," said Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee communications director Jen Crider.

A new ad from Indiana Rep. Baron Hill (D) is indicative of the tone and content of Democrats' attacks on Social Security.



The ad opens with footage of attorney Todd Young, Hill's Republican opponent in the southern Indiana district, calling Social Security a "Ponzi scheme" and then features a series of testimonials from older citizens of the district rejecting the idea that Social Security amounts to a "social welfare" program. "Todd Young is not for us," says a woman at the ad's conclusion.

Ads in being run by Reps. Gabrielle Giffords (Ariz.), Ben Chandler (Ky.), Allen Boyd (Fla.), Earl Pomeroy (N.D.) and Joe Donnelly (Ind.) take a similar strategic tack -- painting Republicans as in favor of drastically changing the retirement program.

And, in Wisconsin's open 7th district, an ad funded by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee's independent expenditure arm -- its first this cycle -- goes after reality TV star Sean Duffy (R) for supporting a plan to privatize Social Security and describes it as "the wrong choice for Wisconsin's families."

(The Social Security ads are coming fast and furious on the Senate side too. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) and appointed Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet have recently aired commercials attacking their opponents' position on the retirement system.)

The strategy behind the Democratic attacks is simple. Older voters are deeply suspicious of any changes to the retirement program -- it's not an accident that Social Security is referred to as the "third rail of American politics" -- and they also happen to be the most reliable voters in lower turnout midterm elections.

According to exit polling from the 2006 midterms, nearly three in ten (29 percent) of voters were 60 and older; Democrats won that age group 50 percent to 48 percent.

Republicans dismiss the Democratic strategy as an age-old attempt to change the subject. "This is a transparent attempt to distract from their budget busting, job-killing policies that have left voters asking the simple question that Democrats still can't answer: 'Where are the jobs,'" said National Republican Congressional Committee communications director Ken Spain.

(Spain also noted that the independent FactCheck.org website disputed Democratic claims that Republicans are "eager" to privatize Social Security.)

And, according to several recent polls, Social Security barely registers as an issue on most voters minds. In an August Gallup poll, just one percent of respondents called Social Security the most pressing issue facing the country (65 percent named the economy) and in a Kaiser poll conducted in mid-August just two percent said they would like to hear candidates talking about Social Security on the campaign trail.

Democratic strategists are aware of the polling data on Social Security but believe it is a gateway issue for voters that will allow their candidates to talk about other ways in which a Republican majority would be bad for average Americans.

Remember that the only way that Democrats believe they can keep their losses at or below historic levels is to make the midterm elections a choice between the two parties rather than a referendum on a Democratic-controlled Washington.

Social Security, they argue, is a key piece to make that "choice" case. Make sure to watch the poll numbers in the districts where Democrats are on the attack on it; if they don't move in the next few weeks, they may not move at all.
 

Times247.com Poll

<a href="http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/should-members-of-congress-be-forced-to-return-profits-derived-from-deals-that-involved-insider-info/question-2298229/" title="Should members of Congress be forced to return profits derived from deals that involved insider information and where should the money go?">Should members of Congress be forced to return profits derived from deals that involved insider information and where should the money go?</a>

Recent News

UK says elderly are “wasting" too many bedrooms

Sunday, February 5, 2012
In yet another outrageous piece of social engineering from the British government, pensioners will be encouraged to downsize to smaller properties allowing local government councils to rent their homes out as public housing and manage the tenancy.
Read Full Story

Federal Employee Gravy Train

Monday, January 30, 2012
Federal workers earn 16 percent more in total compensation — including wages and benefits — than comparable private-sector employees, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The key difference is in benefits, where federal workers average more than $20 per hour in compensation — 48 percent higher than the $13.60 in prorated hourly benefits in the private sector.
Read Full Story

Ind. Lawmakers: "Pee Test For Thee But Not For Me"

Friday, January 27, 2012
Source: Huffington Post
A member of the Indiana General Assembly withdrew his bill to create a pilot program for drug testing welfare applicants Friday after one of his colleagues amended the measure to require drug testing for lawmakers.
Read Full Story

America, arms-dealer to the world

Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Source: Salon.com
Retired lieutenant colonel's take on the military-industrial complex:  As a country, we seem to have a teenager’s fascination with military hardware, an addiction that’s driving us to bust our own national budgetary allowance. At the same time, we sell weapons the way teenage punks sell fireworks to younger kids: for profit and with little regard for how they might be used.
Read Full Story

Still Convinced Tax Increases Work?

Thursday, January 19, 2012
Source: CBSChicago.com
After largest tax increase in Illinois' history, the state still can't pay its bills. Only solution is to cut government spending says state comptroller.
Read Full Story

GOP Voters Split On Interventionism

Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Nearly half of all Republican primary voters say it’s time the U.S. stops intervening in world affairs and focuses on domestic priorities instead, signaling a persistent rift that is playing out in the party’s presidential nomination battle.
Read Full Story

CNN Poll: Obama tied with Romney & Paul in November showdowns

Monday, January 16, 2012
Source: CNN
New CNN/ORC International Poll released Monday also indicates that Mitt Romney and Rep. Ron Paul of Texas are running even with President Obama in possible showdown this November.
Read Full Story

Solid Majority Want ObamaCare Repealed

Monday, January 9, 2012
Most voters still want to see the national health care law repealed and believe repeal of the controversial measure is likely.
Read Full Story

Obama Darling of the Military-Industrial Complex

Friday, January 13, 2012
Source: Raw Story
President Obama is leading the pack in donations from the defense industry: according to the Center for Responsive Politics, he’d taken in almost $112,000 from defense industry donors through December 2011, twice as much as Mitt Romney, the leading Republican recipient of defense-industry campaign contributions.
Read Full Story

How Much Abuse Will We Accept From Government?

Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Source: Huffington Post
Jail inmate dies after deputies directly sprayed him and fogged his cell with pepper spray at least 8 times. Deputies then put him into a restraining chair, a controversial device that binds inmates at both wrists, both ankles, and across the chest, and then sprayed him at least two more times after he had been strapped to the chair. He was also stripped naked, and outfitted with a "spit mask," a hood designed to prevent inmates from spitting on jail personnel, which kept the pepper spray in close proximity to his nose and mouth, ensuring he would continue to inhale it for the full six hours he was in the restraint chair.
Read Full Story
Read All Recent News

Get in the Know Now
Get SSI Email Alerts

First
Last
Zip Code
*Email

Social Networks

 

Action Center

What's New?
Get the latest happenings

Mad Enough?
Join the Fight

Reverse the Raid!
Sign the Petition

No Health Rationing!
Sign the Petition

No More Bailouts!
Sign the Petition

Seniors Sound Off
Submit your Blog Posts

Please Support SSI
With Your Online Donation