Going 'nuclear' on freedom
Originally Posted At Politico
By SEN. Jim Demint
September 8, 2009
 As a matter of raw partisan politics, President Barack Obama and the Democrat Congress may have no choice but to resort to the “nuclear option” to pass their increasingly unpopular plan to take over American health care. In the teeth of intense public opposition, congressional Democrats are having a hard time cobbling together votes on their own side of the aisle.
Meanwhile, the same provisions that have led most Americans to oppose the takeover — the costs, the rationing plans, the government mandates and controls — will ensure almost unanimous Republican opposition in Congress.
Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) are left with two options: Scrap their takeover plans and start over with a more modest and understandable proposal, or ram their massive health care takeover through Congress in the middle of a recession without anyone having so much as read the 1,200-page bill.
After a month of raucous town hall meetings revealed the American people’s skepticism and even hostility to this socialist experiment, passage of the very bill fueling the public outrage might seem unlikely. Indeed, the current level of national engagement on the issue of health reform is precisely the kind of elevated and informative debate Obama promised to cultivate during his campaign.
Exciting ideas such as lawsuit abuse reform, interstate insurance competition and tax fairness in the individual health insurance market are gaining attention and popularity every day. My own Health Care Freedom Plan has been highlighted in newspapers across the country, and the same goes for other alternatives. All the pieces are in place now for a true national debate on health care.
But Washington Democrats don’t want a real debate. The president’s plan, remember, was to rush through the takeover before the August debate ever happened. They feared that the more people learned about what was in those thousand-page proposals, the less people would like them. This fear was realized amid plummeting poll numbers in August and contentious town hall meetings.
So the media are now reporting that Democrat leaders, bent on taking over health care at any cost, are plotting to set aside customary procedure by using parliamentary dirty tricks to ram through their multitrillion-dollar health care takeover, whether the American people like it or not. If Obama and congressional Democrats do indeed pull the trigger and “go nuclear,” it will not be against congressional Republicans or moderates in the Democratic Party. It will be against the American public, who have had it with politicians in both parties whose solution to every problem has been to grow government and their own power.
If and when this happens, the Democrats may suffer at the ballot box, but even if they lose in the near term, they know that eventually they will come back to power and will again be able to build on their socialist experiment. Lose the battle; win the war.
Labor leader Samuel Gompers, when asked what organized labor really wanted, famously answered, “More.” That just about sums up the goal of the left more broadly. If the government takes over health care, does anyone seriously believe that will be it? That no other industry or company or service will become the next target? Has liberalism anywhere ever been satisfied with its current level of control over human and economic activity? Why do you think government grows as fast and as large as it does? To some, government can never have enough control.
If health care, the most personal and private service imaginable, can be taken over using the nuclear option, what’s to stop a future Congress from using it to take over other aspects of our lives? Washington certainly has not shown restraint in taking over car companies, banks and the mortgage industry.
Government power is a terrifying thing and ought to be used sparingly and transparently. If the government can seize freedom in health care using obscure tricks in the dead of night, how can Americans have confidence that our other freedoms are safe? What will Washington go nuclear on next?
Ultimately, the specific issue singled out for government control — bailouts, energy, education or religious liberty — isn’t the main concern. The real target of this nuclear option is freedom itself.
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) is chairman of the Senate Steering Committee.
|
|
Urgent Petition
|
Sign the petition to stop Social Security Cuts and send a fax to every Member of Congress demanding they cut other spending, NOT SOCIAL SECURITY.
Share This Petition
|
Recent News
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Source: ABC News
The Food and Drug Administration has warned doctors to watch for fractures of the upper thigh bone in patients taking several popular drugs designed to prevent hip fractures and fight osteoprothesis. The FDA warns that Fosamax and Boniva in particular, if taken unnecessarily or for too long, may actually be causing the bone fractures they are prescribed to prevent. Watch ABC News video.
Read Full Story
Thursday, May 17, 2012
 Exit Not An Option In Chuck Schumer's America. New York Senator Chuck Schumer has introduced the Fugitive Taxpayer Act of 2012 to re-impose taxes on expatriates after they flee the United States and take up residence in a foreign country. Proposal also would impose a mandatory 30 percent tax on the capital gains of anybody who renounces their U.S. citizenship and would bar such individuals from ever reentering the United States again.
Read Full Story
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Whether President Obama gets his second term or Romney enters the Oval Office, there’s a third candidate no one’s paying much attention to, and that candidate is guaranteed to be the one clear winner of election 2012: the U.S. military and our ever-surging national security state.
Read Full Story
Friday, May 11, 2012
According to the New York Federal Reserve, two million US seniors age 60 and over have student loan debt, on which they owe a collective $36.5 billion; and 11.2 percent of this debt is in default. 4.2 percent of all student loan debt is held by people over the age of 60, and that share grows with each passing year.
Read Full Story
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Across the U.S. economy, anxiety is rising about the potential for widespread disruptions after the November election, when a lame-duck Congress will have barely two months to resolve a grinding standoff over taxes and spending.
Read Full Story
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Two-thirds of Republicans and nine in 10 Democrats polled support making immediate cuts to the military across the board -- a position at odds with the leaderships of both political parties.
Read Full Story
Monday, May 7, 2012
Video revealing the circumstances of how a mentally ill homeless man in Fullerton, Calif. died last July was finally published Monday, revealing a stunningly brutal police assault that left Kelly Thomas bleeding, broken and near death.
Read Full Story
Monday, May 7, 2012
The number of people with jobs declined for the second month in a row, falling by 169,000 in April after easing by 31,000 in March. This means that there were 200,000 fewer Americans with jobs in April than there were in February. Additionally, the percentage of working-age adults who either have jobs or are looking for work, fell to 63.6%, which is the lowest level since December 1981.
Read Full Story
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
In November 2010, a police lieutenant from Parma, Ohio, asked Vanguard Defense Industries if the Texas-based drone manufacturer could mount a “grenade launcher and/or 12-gauge shotgun” on its ShadowHawk drone for U.S. law enforcement agencies. The answer was yes.
Read Full Story
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
A gang attack on two people stopped at a red light in Norfolk, VA has not, until today, appeared in the local newspaper. Local police refuse to follow up on the attack. The responding officer coded the incident as a "simple assault," despite the victims' and witness's assertions that at least 30 people had participated in the attack. A reporter making routine checks of police reports would see "simple assault" and, if the names were unfamiliar, would be unlikely to write about it. In this case, editors hesitated to assign a story about their own employees. Would it seem like the paper treated its employees differently from other crime victims? Something is rotten in Mr. Jefferson's State.
Read Full Story
Read All Recent News
Get in the Know Now
Get SSI Email Alerts
Social Networks
Action Center
|
